Fraunces Tavern

Sometimes listed as Fraunces's Tavern, DeLancey House, The Queen's Head Tavern.

Description

The building known today as "Fraunce's Tavern," located on the corner of Broad and Pearl Streets, has had many roles throughout the city's history. Often celebrated as one of downtown's last vestiges of colonial architecture, today's tavern bears little resemblance to the original structure. As it stands today, the building is a reconstruction based almost entirely on 20th century conjecture, a fact which has made it a controversial subject among preservationists1.

The tavern was originally built as a private city residence by Etienne DeLancey in 1719 on land conveyed to him by his father-in-law, Stephanus Van Cortlandt, the great Dutch magistrate. DeLancey built his house in opulent style to reflect his wealth and success as one of the city's leading merchants. The house stood three stories high with walls made of bricks imported from Holland. The interior of the house boasted fourteen fireplaces, a large kitchen and a dry cellar -- all luxurious features for the time2. The house ceased to be exclusively a private dwelling in 1757, when the two lower floors were used as a warehouse by DeLancey, Robinson & Company3. In 1761, the building was sold to Samuel Fraunces, a noted innkeeper, who opened it as the "Queen's Head Tavern" in reference to his sign depicting an effigy of Queen Charlotte, wife of King George II4.

As a tavern and public house, the building was a veritable center of colonial life. The "good cookery and excellent wines" made it a favorable meeting place for various societies, activists and public events. It housed the very first meeting of the New York Chamber of Commerce in 17685 and was a regular meeting house for the Sons of Liberty as well as for merchants converging about the Stamp Act6. Most notably, the tavern served as George Washington's final residence during the week following the evacuation of the British troops in 1783. It was here that he ceremoniously bade farewell to his officers, marking the final stage of the Revolutionary War7. In 1785, the building was apportioned into offices for the Continental Congress. During New York City's brief interlude as U.S. capital, the building was headquarters for the departments of Foreign Affairs (1785), Treasury (1787) and War (1787)8. In 1788, when the government moved to Philadelphia, and later to Washington, D.C., the building became a boarding house, a saloon, and, later, Glinktenkamp & Precht, a German beer bar with parlor and boarding rooms9.

The building suffered a number of fires throughout the 19th century, after which damaged portions were rebuilt and frequently added onto. At each change of occupancy, remodeling took place to suit the current needs. Nearly all windows, doors, walls and entrances were altered or removed. Many architectural elements, even some of the structural timber, were auctioned off as souvenirs10. In 1852, following another devastating fire, two additional stories and a flat roof were added and most of the brick was replaced by cement. By 1904, when the building was purchased by the Sons of the Revolution, what little remained of the original 18th century structure had been overlaid and obscured11.

In 1906, the Sons of the Revolution hired architect William Mersereau to "restore" the building to its colonial appearance. They planned to revive it as a tavern and make it the society's headquarters. Efforts were made to research the original structure and salvage any original material, however, little information was found. Not even a picture was available. The "restoration," therefore, was a highly speculative one, almost an entirely new construction based on a conglomeration of examples from the period and clearly influenced by the Colonial Revival Movement so popular at the time12. Throughout the 1940's, 50's and 60's, the Sons of the Revolution purchased four abutting buildings: 58 Pearl Street, 101 Broad Street, and 24 and 26 Water Street which became a part of the museum complex.

Fraunces Tavern was one of the first buildings to be designated as a New York City Landmark in 1965, and in 1978, the Fraunces Tavern Block, was designated an Historic District.

Designation Status

Fraunces Tavern was one of the first buildings to be designated as a New York City Landmark in 1965.

Fraunces Tavern Block was designated a New York City Historic District in 1978.

Current Status

Since 1904, Fraunces Tavern has been owned and operated by the Sons of the Revolution as a tavern and colonial museum.

Key Dates in Preservation Activity

Holland Society Tablets- Interest in preserving this 18th century building began as early as 1890 when the Holland Society commemorated the building's history with a plaque. It read: "The old Fraunces Tavern was situated here. Erected by Etienne De Lancey, Samuel Fraunces purchased and opened it as a public house in 1762 under the sign of Queen Charlotte"13.

American Scenic and Historic Preservation Society- Beginning in 1899, the Women's Auxiliary of the American Scenic and Historic Preservation Society made several attempts to secure the tavern. They proposed the city buy the building through condemnation procedures, restore it to its original condition, rent it to a tavern keeper and turn the surrounding block into a public park14.

- Adjoining property owners objected to the park feature, not wanting to relocate their businesses downtown15. Others opposed the cost of the proposal at the public's expense, as Coenties Slip Park, located half a block to the east, already served the outdoor recreational needs of the community16. Still others took issue with the Society's plan to relocate the tavern to the center of the block, which they felt would destroy the value of the building as a historical relic17.

- A second proposal called for the city to purchase the tavern and only a narrow strip of land around the building18.

- In February 1904, the Board of Estimate decided against acquiring the surrounding block and plans for the preservation of the tavern were halted19.

Sons of the Revolution- In May 1904, the Society of the Sons of the Revolution purchased the tavern. They then hired architect William H. Mersereau, in 1906, to restore the building "as nearly as possible" to its former colonial appearance20 and make it the society's headquarters.

- Little source material was uncovered indicating the original appearance of the building apart from the original description of the building as an "elegant three-story and half brick dwelling"21. Mersereau, therefore, relied heavily on other architectural examples of the period to inform his design. One such example was the Frederick Phillipse Manor House in Yonkers whose hip roof Mersereau used as a model22.

- A 1906 photograph taken during the "restoration" shows the tavern as a naked frame after the two upper stories had been removed, the interiors gutted and the exterior walls on three sides had been demolished23. Although efforts were made to salvage original material, the tavern contained almost no remnants of woodwork that had existed in Washington's time24.

- The only authentic discovery was the oak hewn beams found in the floors and ceilings of a few of the rooms on the second and third stories, including the famous Long Room, on either side of which were vestiges of hand-split laths and handmade nails25.

- What was promised to be a "restoration" of the deteriorated tavern became almost entirely a "reconstruction"26. Criticism of the project was sharp and immediate. A letter to the editor of the New York Times from 1906, describes the work done on the tavern as a "scoundrelly piece of vandalism," the writer accuses Mersereau of "deplorable destruction" and asks: "How can men or women, who are pledged to preserve evidences of our country's history, give their consent to so much destructive work?"27

- Despite mounting criticism, the Sons of the Revolution reopened the building as a tavern and colonial museum, with their headquarters atop, on May 1, 1907.

"Lively Original vs. Dead Copy"

- The ardent criticism that began during the 1906 reconstruction continued to be impassioned for the greater part of the century.

- As the reconstruction became more and more a thing of the past, more and more of the public began to erroneously regard and accept Fraunce's Tavern as an authentic colonial structure. This fact, along with a new trend for reconstructing 18th century buildings while 19th century buildings were being demolished at an increasingly alarming rate, sparked a fury among architectural historians and preservationists who railed against these false interpretations through articles, letters to the editor and other publicized methods.

- Ada Louise Huxtable, former architecture critic for the New York Times, was among those at the forefront of this dispute, using her column as an arena for preservation debate. In her 1965 article, "Lively Original vs. Dead Copy," she describes Fraunce's Tavern as neither "old, nor authentic, nor preservation"28. She begs for the tavern to be presented as what it really is: "a modern copy created by scholarly guesswork on some old bones" that possesses "some associative historical usefulness," and she condemns the assertion of the building as "original" to be "a serious error"29.

- In other examples, she berates the act of reconstruction as a "perversion," a "fakery," a "make-believe" and reminds her readers that the whole point of preservation is not to recreate the past, "a laughable impossibility filled with booby traps," but to retain the buildings of the past so that they can remain a "part of the living heritage of the present"30. Fraunces Tavern was one of the first buildings to be designated as a New York City Landmark in 1965.

The Near Loss of the Fraunces Tavern Block In the 1970s, the block surrounding Fraunces Tavern was threatened with demolition. In 1974, the Uris Corporation, owner of the buildings, moved forward with plans to replace several of the buildings with a parking lot31. Faced with the loss of these buildings the New York Landmark Conservancy stepped in to halt the demolition. The Conservancy worked with the Sons of the Revolution "to organize a feasibility study of preservation possibilities" and to find an alternative to demolition32. In 1978, the buildings on the Fraunces Tavern Block were saved when the New York Landmarks Conservancy purchased them33. The transaction was possible due to a grant the Conservancy received from the Astor Foundation and a generous deal from Warner Communications. After the block was saved and the deeds transferred, the Landmarks Preservation Commission designated it a historic district in 1978.

Archives, Personal files, and Ephemura

• 1. White, Norvell and Elliot Willensky; AIA Guide to New York City: The Classic Guide to New York's Architecture, New York: Three Rivers Press, 2000.
• 2. Mersereau, Williiam H., "How Fraunce's Tavern was Restored", The New York Times; March 17, 1907.
• 3. "Old Fraunce's Tavern", The New York Tribune July 29, 1890.
• 4. Lossing, Benson J., "Historic Houses of America", Appleton's Journal of Literature, Science and Art, June 4, 1874, Volume XI, Number 272.
• 5. "Fraunce's Tavern Restored, Dedicated", The New York Times, December 5, 1907.
• 6. Mersereau, William H., "How Fraunce's Tavern was Restored", The New York Times, March 17, 1907.
• 7. Baker, William S., "Itinerary of General Washington From June 15, 1775 to December 23, 1783", The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, 1891, Volume 15.
• 8. "Fire Damages Room at Fraunce's Tavern", The New York Times, July 1, 2001.
• 9. "May Hide Dark Secrets of Fraunce's Tavern", The New York Times, May 20, 1904.
• 10. "Old Fraunce's Tavern", The New York Tribune, July 20, 1890.
• 11. Huxtable, Ada Louise, "Fraunce's Tavern Controversy", The New York Times, June 6, 1965.
• 12. Guide to New York City Landmarks: Fourth Edition, Hoboken: John, Wiley & Sons, 2009.
• 13. "Holland Society Tablets", The New York Times, September 30, 1890.
• 14. "Fraunce's Tavern", The New York Times, May 30, 1902.
• 15. "Fraunce's Tavern Protest", The New York Times, January 23, 1903.
• 16. "Fraunce's Tavern", The New York Times, May 30, 1902.
• 17. "Fraunce's Tavern: Arguments For and Against Purchase of Sufficient Land Around It For a Park", The New York Times, February 7, 1904.
• 18. Ibid.
• 19. "No Fraunce's Tavern Park", The New York Times, February 27, 1904.
• 20. "Sons of the Revolution Buy Fraunce's Tavern", The New York Times, May 19, 1904.
• 21. Huxtable, Ada Louise, "Fraunce's Tavern Controversy", The New York Times, June 6, 1965.
• 22. Mersereau, William H., "How Fraunce's Tavern Was Restored", The New York Times, March 17, 1907.
• 23. Huxtable, Ada Louise, "Fraunce's Tavern Controversy", The New York Times, June 6, 1965.
• 24. Mersereau, William H., "How Fraunce's Tavern Was Restored", The New York Times, March 17, 1907.
• 25. Ibid.
• 26. Huxtable, Ada Louise, "Fraunce's Tavern Controversy", The New York Times, June 6, 1965.
• 27. Affleck, T.S., "Letter to the Editor: Renovation That Leaves No Vestige of the Original Building", The New York Times, September 15, 1906.
• 28. Huxtable, Ada Louise, "Lively Original vs. Dead Copy", The New York Times, May 8, 1965.
• 29. Huxtable, Ada Louise, "Fraunce's Tavern Controversy", The New York Times, June 6, 1965.
• 30. Huxtable, Ada Louise, "Where Did We Go Wrong?", The New York Times, July 14, 1968.
• 31. Fraunces Tavern Block Historic District Designation Report. November 14, 1978.
• 32. Huxtable, Ada Louise. "The Bulldozer
• 33. McNeil, Donald G. "Five Historic Manhattan Buildings Sold to Restorers," New York Times. May 6, 1978.